Comments on: The lessons of climategate http://www.fdsd.org/2009/12/lessons_of_climategate/ working to equip democracy to deliver sustainable development Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:06:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Paul Grice http://www.fdsd.org/2009/12/lessons_of_climategate/comment-page-1/#comment-72 Paul Grice Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:43:31 +0000 http://www.fdsd.org/?p=833#comment-72 The climate is doing exactly what it has always done - change. the bunkem of pseudo-science employed by the PTB and the MSM leads me to one question: What 'Weapons of Mass Destruction'? Al Qaeda, who? where? how? Pandemic? Where? When? And why was the vaccine patented before the 'virus' was discovered? FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD...that's why, when and how! Oh, more Ice now than in 2004, more Polar bears now than in 2004. BULLSHIT!! The climate is doing exactly what it has always done – change. the bunkem of pseudo-science employed by the PTB and the MSM leads me to one question: What ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’? Al Qaeda, who? where? how? Pandemic? Where? When? And why was the vaccine patented before the ‘virus’ was discovered? FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD…that’s why, when and how! Oh, more Ice now than in 2004, more Polar bears now than in 2004. BULLSHIT!!

]]> By: gofer http://www.fdsd.org/2009/12/lessons_of_climategate/comment-page-1/#comment-71 gofer Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:59:58 +0000 http://www.fdsd.org/?p=833#comment-71 There are several fatal flaws in the e-mails, such as Briffia's admission that the temps a 1000 yrs. ago were probably as warm as today. How about the admission that they were "nowhere near balancing the energy budget" and "cannot explain the present cooling trend." Adding actual temps to proxy temps as in "hide the decline." The entire focus was to make sure that a warming trend was shown. Considering the Pachauri of the IPCC, along with Gore and a bunch of others, are up to their necks in "green" investments and seems to be on the board of every environmental venture in the world, the whole thing stinks. If the e-mails were courtroom evidence, the defendant would get the "chair." There are several fatal flaws in the e-mails, such as Briffia’s admission that the temps a 1000 yrs. ago were probably as warm as today. How about the admission that they were “nowhere near balancing the energy budget” and “cannot explain the present cooling trend.”

Adding actual temps to proxy temps as in “hide the decline.” The entire focus was to make sure that a warming trend was shown. Considering the Pachauri of the IPCC, along with Gore and a bunch of others, are up to their necks in “green” investments and seems to be on the board of every environmental venture in the world, the whole thing stinks.

If the e-mails were courtroom evidence, the defendant would get the “chair.”

]]>